|
As for IPTV, Baijal pointed out that while at the moment it is
difficult to know about a viable business case, eventually internet
streaming of television content would happen. It is just a matter
of upgrading the network. He pointed out that at one time there
were doubts expressed about voice calls through the internet.
To illustrate the benefits of a regulatory regime, he gave the
example of the telecom sector. From 1948-1998 there was a two per
cent achievement in teledensity. However, since then each year around
two per cent has been added. He however pointed out that regulation
takes time to take effect. Trai had recommended regulations for
the telecom sector in 1997 and the effects were felt from 2000.
Trai only started regulating cable television from last year.
He expressed concern that broadband had still to take off despite
a broadband regulatory framework being put in place last year. He
is hopeful that the rural telecom regulations that have been put
forth will be accepted by the government. The regulations suggest
among other things the setting up of a broadband mechanism for rural
areas.
Trai has also put forth recommendations for unified licensing in
the cable TV arena. If this goes through then technologies like
set top boxes that are on display at Scat will be useful. The cable
TV network could then be used to provide interactivity. Baijal said
that the regulator recognises that cable TV, voice market and broadband
can co-exist.
As far as the vexed Cas issue is concerned Baijal says that while
Trai has put forth recommendations on the same it is doubtful whether
it will come about as a government effort. It will need private
operators i.e. cable ops, broadcasters to come together and work
out a solution. He noted that in Chennai a special set of circumstances
had enabled Cas to come into effect. Trai is till working on issues
like whether clubbing together of channels should be allowed, he
noted.
|