|
A medianet press release issued by Zee Telefilms (ZTL) claims that
the company is the exclusive advertisement collection agent for
both Asia Today Limited (ATL) and Expand Fast Holdings Limited (EFHL).
Both these companies are wholly owned subsidiaries of ZTL and earn
up to 15 per cent commission on advertising revenue collected on
the channels operated by these companies, says the release.
The DCCE (Appeals) has contended that ZTL has acted as an advertising
agent and is liable to pay service tax on the above collection commission
it received from ATL and EFHL.
In separate cases, Star India Pvt Ltd and Mukta Arts have been
asked to pay Rs 76.6 million and Rs 167.5 million respectively for
allegedly the same reasons. Star India will also have to pay a penalty
of Rs 76.6 million.
A press note from the service tax cell of the central excise commissionerate
IV said these companies had failed to reveal their advertisement
revenue, which attracts service tax. The investigations by the cell
also revealed that these companies were advertising agencies and
had thus provided a service to clients between 1999 and 2001.
The companies had appealed against the adjudication orders. The
commissioner (Appeals), by an interim order on 13 August, refused
to grant a stay and asked the companies to pay up.
While Star and Zee have been asked to pay another Rs 200 per day
as penalties on delayed payment and penalties for failure to obtain
registration and filing of returns, Mukta Arts has been penalised
with Rs 100 per day.
Meanwhile, the ZTL press release has stated that the contention
of DCCE that ZTL is liable to pay service tax on commission it has
earned from ATL and EFHL as the exclusive collection agent is not
accurate.
The release refers to the fact that till a few years back, the
government of India did not allow private satellite channels to
be uplinked from India. As a result, broadcasting operations were
conducted by companies that were based outside India and channels
were uplinked from outside the country. These companies in turn
appointed Indian companies as exclusive collection agents for their
advertising income.
The release says that ATL and EFHL had appointed ZTL as the exclusive
advertisement collection agent for all the channels being broadcast
by them. ZTL was earning upto 15 per cent commission for this work.
From the gross advertising revenues, EFHL and ATL also settled the
15 per cent commission payable to advertising agencies, for providing
advertising services to their clients (advertisers).
The release adds that the services rendered by advertising agencies
were brought within the ambit of service tax levy w.e.f. November
1996. Consequently, Government has been collecting 5 per cent service
tax from the advertising agencies, on the 15 per cent commission
earned by them. Now, says the release, it is the contention of DCCE
that the commission earned by ZTL from ATL and EFHL is also liable
to service tax, since ZTL also acted as an advertising agent of
ATL and EFHL.
The ZTL release says that it is very clear that the service tax
was applicable to advertising agencies on the advertising commission
earned by them and since ZTL never provided advertising services,
nor was an advertising agent, service tax is not applicable.
Referring to the present scenario, ZTL release says it is in the
process of filing an appeal in the CEGAT Tribunal against this order,
and is confident of proving its case.
|